Archive for the ‘General’ Category

David Cameron pretending to be common

Friday, May 6th, 2011

Bit depressed today. As someone on Twitter put it:

“Fuck Clegg. Fuck Blunkett. Fuck Cameron. Fuck Dorries. Fuck that stupid bitch who’s running the #no2AV campaign. Fuck the UK electorate.

“Fuck the lies. Fuck the cynicism. Fuck the greedy self important cunts in parliament. Fuck Murdoch and all his minions. Fuck the Daily Fail

“Fuck the police. Fuck ACPO. Fuck the journalists who allowed this farce to pass untested.

“Fuck this miserable self regarding racist illiberal shitpile that used to claim to be the mother of parliaments & birthplace of human rights.”

(from Gaijinsan21)

But I take my pleasures where I can in these gloomy times.  And today, as well as yielding links to Nick Clegg looking sad, Twitter has sent my way this great website showing David Cameron pretending to be common.

Have a look. Cheer yourselves up.

Conveyancing

Wednesday, November 17th, 2010

Today I hit new lows of stress and panic. I’ts been a fairly hectic few months, not helped by the fact that we own a flat in London which we currently rent out. When we left London, selling the flat would have meant we lost loads of money as the market was so unstable. So we rented up in Yorkshire, and rented our flat out.

I won’t go into details, but due to a leaky bathroom, a neighbour in the flat below whose idea of diplomacy would put Pol Pot up for the Nobel peace prize in comparison, and the bastard thieving nature of insurance companies, we decided to sell the flat and be shot of the whole worrying package.

So this brings me on to the point of this post. It’s a simple sale. No chain – our buyers currently rent, and we’re not buying another place now. They were preapproved for a mortgage, the surveys went through all tickety-boo. So why are we now in a position where our tenants are moving out in just under 3 weeks and we have no end in sight?

Is there a secret conveyancers’ code?  Our friends just went through a similar thing where the buyer’s solicitors kept giving absurd advice on the leasehold of the property, and taking this as a cautionary tale, we accepted our buyers’ much reduced offer subject to them taking the lease on as it stands. We’d protect ourselves by making the sale as simple as possible, we thought. Well, that’s out of the fucking water. We’ve been asked for all sorts of information – some of which we can get, some of which we can’t. The freeholder won’t provide some of it – he has no legal responsibility to do so, and we’re not obliged to either. But our buyers conveyancers are insisting on it. We’re now at an impasse where they want some info from us, we can’t get it, and no one will budge. So what happens now? No one seems to know.

What I do know is that every day about 3 hours are taken up with endless and pointless phone calls which seem to cause no shift in the process. I am trying to run a business and instead am spending my time speaking to my estate agent who is as bemused as I am about the whole process.

In the meantime, our tenants, given 2 months notice, decided to complain about us and to threaten us with legal action. We never got to the bottom of the basis for this, but they dropped it when they realised there was nothing in the law which catered for taking people to court for serving legal notice in the correct legal manner.

I am sorry – this is a rant-y and self interested post. But I do think the question needs asking. What do conveyancers actually do? Every piece of information etc that has been needed, I have chased up and eventually delivered.  The solicitor – or more usually his secretary – speaks to me about once a week to let me know that the buyer’s solicitor has raised another concern.

What a load of toot, as Lord Sugar would say.

Eskil Ronningsbakken

Friday, July 16th, 2010

Wow.  Just slowly gearing up for a busy Friday when the Guardian homepage drew my attention to the balancing artist Eskil Ronningsbakken.

As a sufferer of vertigo (I even get a rush of fear, nausea and exhileration if I drop something down the stairs!) these pictures caused me much discomfort and some amazement.  I recommend a look.

From The Guardian

Our democratic rights

Thursday, December 17th, 2009

When the whole Web 2.0 thing began being used for comments on news sources, I thought it was brilliant. I loved posting what I fondly imagined to be my lucid and enlightening arguments, convinced I would sway the debate with my elegant reasoning. It didn’t take long for disillusionment to set in. Comment threads I got embroiled in include, from memory, a nasty debate about whether Crash or Brokeback Mountain should have won the best film Oscar; news articles written by my friend The Queen of Cakes on which I would try and defend her from sniping, gripy comments; discussions on Mugabe in which I tried to convince other contributors that black empowerment rhetoric is just so much cant if you’re actually brutalising, starving and killing the people you’re supposed to be empowering.

Through these bruising encounters I realised that many people who post comments on news stories already have their mind made up – and are unlikely to engage in any rational debate. So it is with sadness but no surprise that I heard about the BBC discussion forum which asked users of its African news website whether homosexuals should be executed. In context, and sadly, while inflammatory, it  is not such a stupid question to ask – as it refers to a programme on the World Service highlighting the shocking news that the Ugandan Parliament is considering a bill which would see gay activity punishable by the death sentence in Uganda.

I don’t really know where to start with this story.  Lets just say, though that we leave aside the shocking implications of this bill, and the continued and frustrating refusal of countries across Africa to recognise sexual orientation as a basic human right; and the wrongheadedness of the BBC in using what must be seen as a deliberately provocative title to their forum (it has now been changed to the more considered “Should Uganda debate gay execution?”).  What I’d like to look at is the inevitable commentary that this story provoked.

The comments which The Guardian pointed out in their report on the story have now been removed, so that Chris, from Guildford, who said at 8.59am yesterday “”Totally agree. Ought to be imposed in the UK too, asap. Bring back some respectable family values. Why do we have to suffer ‘gay pride’ festivals? Would I be allowed to organise a ’straight pride’ festival? No, thought as much!! If homosexuality is natural, as we are forced to believe, how can they sustain the species? I suggest all gays are put on a remote island somewhere and left for a generation – after which, theoretically there should be none left!”

This one, from Caiyai in London, is still there however: “I can see why the leaders of Africa has impose this bill. Take a look at the world and what people are doing. The traditional laws and ways of life seems to be irrelevent and eroding away to those who have accepted certain ways with society now. We have forgotten the value and purpose of life.  Not because the western countries has laws that protect them and their sexual preference/ needs. That does not mean that another country should adhere to these rules”.

The beeb has obviously now censored the debate and while some very dubious comments remain, it is now a broadly speaking civilised exchange of views (albeit many of them ones I personally find deeply unsettling). But what really makes me lose my faith in humanity in all its variety of views and standpoints is that it takes this sort of editing to ensure that this is the case.

What the duck?

Thursday, November 26th, 2009

Spare a thought for Ivor Ingall, beleagured designer of the “garden folly” which saw Gosport MP Sir Peter Viggers (Con) resign when he tried to claim for his floating duck island.

The expenses weren’t honoured – it was more the audacity of the attempt to claim which The Telegraph (and where do I start with the irresponsibility of their reporting of the whole expenses swizz?) pounced on.

Now the charming Mr Ingall says the publicity has harmed his business, and sales of the islands have plummeted from 15 in 2007, to two in 2009.

As widely reported today on the BBC, Mr Ingall said “The trouble is that my duck island has really become the icon of the bad guys… People are not ordering the garden follies that I produce quite like they were.”

scottish_baronialvenetianqueen_anne_kennel

As examples of his work include Scottish Castle hen house (left, price on application)  a Venetian Villa bird table (centre, £763.75) and the budget Queen Anne Dog Kennel (right, £2,232.50), is it not possible that people have better things to spend their money on during a recession?  Or even that there’s been a collective realisation of the utter tastelessness of these items?

Meanwhile, on other pages of their website:

duck-island-man-no-news